Software engineered for vehicles, fleets and the dealers who run them

Automotive

A vehicle keeps generating data long after it leaves the factory, and a dealer network keeps running long after a software vendor stops answering calls. This practice builds connected-vehicle, fleet and dealer systems that hold up under real-time constraints and years of unglamorous operation.

AI augmented, human governedEvidence before estimatesYour IP from day oneOne accountable owner per engagementFounded in 2011. Part of the Vinove Group500+ full-time engineers, as of September 2026NASSCOM member

01Start from the fleet, not the framework

Name the operational pressure first.

Automotive buyers usually arrive with an operational problem, not a technology wish list. A dealer network on disconnected systems, a fleet needing real-time visibility, or a diagnostics platform too old to extend safely, each names a different pressure. Naming it narrows the route to the fitting practice.

02Real-time constraints as a design input

Built for latency, vibration and the service bay.

Automotive software rarely gets a second chance mid-drive, so the delivery process treats real-time behaviour and automotive-grade safety expectations as architecture decisions, not late fixes. Interfaces are tested against intermittent connectivity, sensor noise and the hardware variance a fleet actually runs, before a release goes anywhere near a vehicle.

  1. Frame the real-time and safety surface

    Latency budgets, failure modes and the safety expectations a vehicle programme must meet are mapped before a line of interface code exists.

    A safety map before architecture
  2. Design for intermittent connectivity

    Offline queues, conflict resolution and graceful degradation are built in from the first diagram, because a fleet vehicle loses signal more than any test network admits.

    Architecture that tolerates the field
  3. Validate on the hardware that ships

    Telematics and diagnostics interfaces are exercised against the sensor and connector variance a real fleet carries, not one reference unit in a lab.

    Tested against real hardware variance
  4. Ship with the rollback plan attached

    Over-the-air updates go out behind a staged rollout and a rehearsed rollback, so a bad release never reaches an entire fleet at once.

    A release the field can trust

03Services for automotive, matched to the standard each one answers to

Find the automotive service you came for, and the standard it must meet.

Automotive buyers search for a named system, not a practice area. The ledger maps each system to the deliverable behind it, the standards it has to honour, and the practice that owns the build. The four standards beneath the ledger shape every architecture decision before code is written.

Automotive services, the deliverable behind each, and the standards that govern it
What you needWhat we buildStandards and integrationsWhere it lives
Dealer management system integrationAn integration layer joining DMS, CRM, parts and service tools into one dealer viewCDK, Reynolds and Reynolds, Keyloop, STAR XML, OEM dealer APIsSystem Integration
Fleet telematics platformIngestion, storage and dashboards for vehicle location, health and driver events across a mixed fleetOBD-II, CAN bus (SAE J1939), MQTT, GPS/NMEA, AWS IoT CoreIoT Development Services
Connected-vehicle and OTA update pipelineStaged over-the-air update service with rollback, campaign control and device attestationUptane, UNECE R156 (SUMS), ISO/SAE 21434, TLS certificate managementIoT Development Services
Vehicle diagnostics platformA diagnostics data pipeline and analyst tooling rebuilt from the legacy system without losing vehicle historyOBD-II diagnostic trouble codes, UDS (ISO 14229), SAE J2534, ODXData Modernization
Predictive maintenance modelFailure-prediction models trained on sensor and service history, evaluated before a technician sees a recommendationISO 26262 safety context, MLflow evaluation runs, telematics feature storesMachine Learning Development
Safety-critical software processRequirements traceability, static analysis and test evidence organised around the functional-safety lifecycleISO 26262 (ASIL), AUTOSAR Classic and Adaptive, MISRA C, Automotive SPICECustom Software Development
Standard

ISO 26262

Functional safety for road vehicles. The ASIL assigned to a function decides how much traceability, testing and documentation the build carries, so classification is settled before architecture.

Platform

AUTOSAR

The layered software architecture ECU programmes standardise on. Building against it keeps application code portable across supplier hardware and makes integration with an OEM platform predictable.

Integration

OBD-II and CAN bus

The diagnostic port and vehicle network every telematics device reads from. Ingestion is designed around their message rates, dropouts and the hardware variance real fleets carry.

Regulation

UNECE R155 and R156

Cybersecurity and software-update management regulations for type approval. They require a managed update process with rollback and audit, which is why OTA pipelines ship staged.

04Evidence and proof

Vehicles and dealer networks that kept running.

Automotive proof needs to hold up in the field, not just the demo. These previews show the standard while written client approvals are collected.

Explore case studies
Dealer and OEM systems integrated into one operational view.
Halden Motor Group · Dealer network, EU (sample)

A dealer network unified without a single system replaced.

Halden Motor Group ran its dealer sites on disconnected inventory and service tools. Integration layered on the existing dealer management system gave every site the same real-time view within one rollout.

Dealer sites connected
Every site, one rollout
Systems replaced
Zero
Sample · pending client approval
Fleet telematics dashboard tracking vehicles through a connectivity outage.
Regional fleet operator · Sample engagement, Nordics

Fleet telematics that survived its first winter.

A regional fleet operator needed real-time vehicle location and diagnostics across a mixed fleet. The pipeline held through connectivity drops and cold-weather sensor faults without losing a vehicle's history.

Fleet visibility
Continuous
Vehicle history lost
None
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of a fleet operations lead reviewing a fleet dashboard.

They designed for the moment our signal drops, not just the moment it works.

Sofia LindqvistHead of Fleet Operations, Nordvik Fleet Services (sample)
Sample · pending client approval

05Four doors into automotive engineering

Enter through the practice that fits the problem.

Automotive work usually starts at one of four doors. Connect the vehicle, rebuild the data behind diagnostics, apply AI where the evidence supports it, or integrate dealer and OEM systems that were never built to talk. Every door runs through the same real-time delivery discipline.

  • Connect the vehicle and the fleet

    Telematics and IoT engineering that gets sensor and location data off the vehicle reliably.

    IoT Development
  • Modernise the diagnostics data

    Diagnostic and fleet data pipelines rebuilt so maintenance decisions rest on numbers people trust.

    Data Modernization
  • Apply AI to maintenance and service

    Predictive maintenance and service automation built with evaluation evidence before any claim ships.

    AI & Automation
  • Integrate dealer and OEM systems

    Dealer management, OEM and supplier systems connected without replacing what already works.

    System Integration

06Straight answers

Asked before an automotive budget is set.

Do you build software for connected vehicles?

Yes, including telematics ingestion, over-the-air update pipelines and the in-vehicle interfaces that depend on them. Every build accounts for intermittent connectivity and the bandwidth a vehicle actually has, not an office network. Latency budgets are set before interface design begins.

Can you take over a legacy dealer management system?

Yes, starting with an integration assessment rather than a rebuild by default. Automotive dealer software transitions usually succeed by layering new capability on the existing system, and replacement enters the conversation only when the platform genuinely cannot be extended.

How do you handle real-time fleet data?

Ingestion pipelines are built for intermittent connectivity, with offline queues and conflict resolution handling the gaps a moving fleet always creates. Data lands in one governed store so dispatch, maintenance and reporting stop disagreeing on the number.

Do you engineer to automotive safety standards?

Where a system touches safety-critical behaviour, yes, and classification is settled early because it changes the testing and documentation burden. We scope the safety surface honestly and bring in specialist certification counsel when a programme needs it.

How is automotive software work priced?

Against the real-time and integration surface uncovered during scoping, not a flat industry rate. A dealer integration and a safety-critical telematics build carry different risk, so the estimate follows the actual engineering rather than an average.

Can you integrate with OEM and supplier systems?

Regularly, since almost no automotive system operates alone. OEM data feeds, supplier catalogues and legacy dealer platforms are connected through documented interfaces, each tested against the quirks the real system has.

Do you build predictive maintenance with AI?

Where the data supports it. Sensor and service history feed models evaluated against real failure data before any maintenance recommendation reaches a technician, and we say plainly when the data is not there yet.

Can you rebuild an existing telematics platform?

Yes, beginning with an assessment of the data pipeline and hardware fleet already in the field. The transition includes a stabilisation plan before any new feature work starts, so the existing fleet keeps reporting throughout.