Software where patient safety is a requirement, not a value

Healthcare

Healthcare software carries a weight most software never faces: a defect can harm a patient and a privacy lapse can end a business. This practice builds for that reality. Five healthcare specialisations plus security engineering, delivered by teams who treat compliance as a design input rather than a final inspection.

Compliance as a design inputPatient data stays protectedAI augmented, human governedEvidence before estimatesYour IP from day oneOne accountable owner per engagementFounded in 2011. Part of the Vinove Group500+ full-time engineers, as of September 2026NASSCOM member
Watch · the 90-second brief

Healthcare engineering, in brief

Building for care delivery where compliance is a design input from day one.

90 secWatch without filling in a form.
A clinical workflow carried by compliant software.90 secSample frame · video pending

01Start from the ward, not the tech

Name the problem in care terms.

Healthcare buyers rarely need a technology list. They need virtual care that works, records that travel, clinicians freed from admin or data that becomes evidence. Choose the pressure your organisation feels and the map narrows to the specialisations built for it.

02Compliance as a design input

Built to pass the audit it will face.

Every healthcare engagement runs a delivery system where the regulatory work happens inside the build rather than after it. The result ships with its own evidence: threat models, access design, audit trails and the documentation your compliance officer actually needs.

  1. Frame the compliance surface

    HIPAA, GDPR and regional health rules are mapped to the feature list before architecture begins. Nobody discovers a consent requirement in week nine.

    A regulatory map for the build
  2. Design for protected data

    PHI boundaries, encryption, access roles and audit logging are architectural decisions here, recorded with their reasoning for your security review.

    Architecture a CISO can sign
  3. Build with clinical users in the loop

    Increments go in front of clinicians and patients early, because a workflow that fights the ward fails no matter how clean the code is.

    Software, clinically tested
  4. Ship with the audit trail

    Each release carries its compliance evidence: test records, access reviews and data-handling documentation, ready for the auditor who will eventually ask.

    An audit-ready evidence pack

03What a healthcare organisation commissions

Healthcare services by the name a clinical leader searches for.

Healthcare organisations rarely commission a technology; they commission a named service with a regulation attached. The ledger pairs each service with what gets built, the standards that govern it and the practice that owns the work.

Services for healthcare: the service, the deliverable, the standards it must satisfy and the practice that builds it
What you needWhat we buildStandards and integrationsWhere it lives
EHR and EMR software developmentElectronic record systems with role-based access, audit logging and structured clinical dataHIPAA, HL7 FHIR R4, HL7 V2, SNOMED CT and LOINCEHR Software Development
HL7 and FHIR integrationInterface engines and FHIR APIs connecting labs, imaging, billing and legacy hospital systemsHL7 FHIR R4, HL7 V2, SMART on FHIR, Epic and Oracle Health APIsEHR Software Development
Telemedicine platform developmentVideo consultation, scheduling, e-prescribing and remote monitoring with consent and encryption built inHIPAA, WebRTC, FHIR R4, DICOM where imaging is sharedTelemedicine Software Development
Patient and clinician app developmentNative and cross-platform apps with secure authentication, offline handling and accessibility built inHIPAA, GDPR, WCAG 2.2, Apple HealthKit and Google Health ConnectHealthcare App Development
Clinical data platforms and analyticsGoverned pipelines from record to dashboard, with de-identification and lineage on every datasetHIPAA de-identification rules, OMOP CDM, FHIR Bulk Data, AWS HealthLakeHealthcare Data & Analytics
Clinical AI and documentation automationAmbient documentation, intake extraction and triage support with clinician review on every outputHIPAA, FDA SaMD guidance, IEC 62304 where the software qualifies as a deviceAI for Healthcare
Standard

HL7 FHIR R4

FHIR defines the resources and REST APIs clinical systems exchange, so record models are shaped around Patient, Encounter and Observation from the first schema rather than translated later.

Regulation

HIPAA

The Security Rule requires access controls, audit logs and transmission encryption for protected health information. Those requirements become architecture decisions, recorded with reasoning and evidence before the first release.

Integration

SMART on FHIR

SMART adds OAuth 2.0 authorisation and app launch to FHIR, which is how a third-party app runs inside Epic or Oracle Health without holding its own copy of the record.

Platform

AWS HealthLake

HealthLake stores FHIR data in a managed, queryable form with HIPAA-eligible controls, giving analytics and AI work a governed source rather than raw exports from the EHR.

04Evidence and proof

Care systems that passed their audits.

Healthcare proof must carry compliance evidence as well as outcomes, so the bar here is doubled. These previews show the standard while written client approvals are collected.

Explore case studies
Clinicians using a governed telehealth workflow across clinics.
Koru Health · Care platform, US

A telehealth platform that held through a 40-clinic rollout.

Koru Health took virtual consultations from pilot to production across their network. Compliance evidence shipped with every release, and the audit passed first time.

Clinics live
Every site, one programme
Audit findings
Zero majors
Sample · pending client approval
Clinical documents flowing through a verified processing pipeline.
US care network · Sample engagement

Clinical intake automated, with every decision reviewable.

Manual intake was consuming clinical hours daily. Extraction with human verification cut the queue while keeping an auditable trail on every record.

Intake effort
Cut by two thirds
Records with audit trail
Every one
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of a healthcare product leader in a clinical setting.

They asked about our consent flows before our tech stack. That told me everything about how this would go.

Anika RaoVP Product, Koru Health
Sample · pending client approval

05Three doors into healthcare work

Enter through the door that fits the risk.

Some healthcare work needs a specialised build, some needs a broader engineering partner, and some needs AI capability applied with unusual care. The healthcare specialisations above go deep, while the wider practices bring scale when the problem outgrows a single specialisation. Every door inherits the same compliance-first delivery system.

  • Scope a compliance-bound build

    A priced scoping engagement that maps the clinical workflow, the regulatory surface and the architecture before any budget commits.

    Project Scoping
  • Commission custom clinical software

    Purpose-built systems for workflows no product covers, carried by the custom software practice under healthcare governance.

    Custom Software Development
  • Bring AI into care safely

    The AI practice applied under clinical constraints: evaluation first, humans in the loop, and claims that survive scrutiny.

    AI & Automation

06Straight answers

Asked before healthcare budgets commit.

How do you handle HIPAA compliance in practice?

As engineering, not paperwork. PHI boundaries are drawn in the architecture, access is role-based and logged, encryption covers data at rest and in transit, and business associate agreements are standard. The evidence pack builds up release by release, so audit day is a retrieval exercise rather than a scramble.

Do you integrate with existing hospital systems?

Constantly, because almost no healthcare software lives alone. HL7 and FHIR interfaces, lab systems, imaging, billing and legacy EHR integrations are core healthcare software development services here, with each integration contract documented and tested against the real system's quirks.

Can you work with clinical safety requirements like IEC 62304?

Yes, where the software qualifies as or borders on a medical device. Classification is settled early because it changes the documentation and testing burden materially. If your product needs a regulatory pathway we build to it, and we say plainly when specialist regulatory counsel should join.

What does healthcare software development cost?

More than equivalent software outside healthcare, and honestly so, because compliance engineering and clinical validation are real work. Scoping produces the number against your regulatory surface, so the quote reflects your actual obligations rather than an optimistic average.

How is patient data handled during development?

Production PHI stays out of development environments as a rule. Synthetic and de-identified data carry the build, access to any real data is logged and minimal, and data processing terms are written before the first record moves. Your privacy officer gets the data-flow map as a standard artefact.

Can you take over an existing healthcare application?

Yes, starting with a compliance and code assessment rather than assumptions. Healthcare app development company transitions carry extra duty of care, so the handover includes a privacy review, dependency audit and a stabilisation plan before any feature work begins.

Where does AI safely fit in healthcare today?

Where the failure mode is acceptable and a human stays in the loop: documentation burden, intake processing, scheduling and triage support. Diagnostic territory demands evidence standards most teams underestimate. We build the safe cases well and decline the unsafe ones plainly.