For platforms that have to work as well on-premises as they do in Azure

Hire Azure Developers

Azure gives a team enough surface area that small inconsistencies compound quietly. Portal-clicked resources, sprawling identity rules and hybrid connections can each drift on their own. These engineers are tested on catching that drift, then placed to keep your tenant coherent as it grows.

  • Profiles typically within two business days
  • Replacement Assurance: If an engineer is not the right fit, a replacement from our own team starts within ten business days of your request, at no extra cost
  • You interview before placement if you want to
  • At least four hours a day inside your core working hours. Two hours plus a daily written handover for the US West Coast
  • 14-Day Risk-Free Trial: For your first engineer on a time-and-materials engagement. Up to 14 calendar days or 80 logged working hours, whichever comes first. End within the trial and pay nothing for trial hours. Continue beyond it and those hours are billed at the agreed rate. Unpaid trial work remains ours if you stop
Tenants kept coherent as they growReplacement is our cost, not yoursAI augmented, human governedEvidence before estimatesYour IP from day oneOne accountable owner per engagementFounded in 2011. Part of the Vinove Group500+ full-time engineers, as of September 2026NASSCOM member
Watch · the 90-second brief

How we evaluate an Azure engineer

The tasks, the signals and the onboarding, walked through by the people who run them.

90 secWatch without filling in a form.
Engineers reviewing an Azure tenant architecture together.90 secSample frame · video pending

01Published, not promised

The assessment behind every engineer we send.

The Azure bar is published, not assumed: five competencies, the exact task behind each, and the shortcut that ends a candidacy. Most interviews ask about certifications. This one asks whether the tenant actually holds together.

What we listen forWhether they design access rules around actual risk, not just enable MFA everywhere.

The task we set

A client reports that MFA prompts are inconsistent across apps registered in Microsoft Entra ID. Diagnose why.

What strong sounds like
Traces the inconsistency to specific conditional-access policy gaps or app-registration differences and proposes a coherent policy set.
What gives us pause
Recommends enabling MFA globally without diagnosing why the existing policies were already inconsistent.
Core

Azure · Bicep · PowerShell

Compute

AKS · App Service · Azure Functions

Identity

Entra ID · Conditional Access · RBAC

Tooling

Azure Monitor · Azure DevOps · Cost Management

02Who you actually meet

The bench, priced by seniority.

Three seniority tiers, priced honestly, and the engineers who fill each one today. Real names and photos take their place as soon as we can share them, and the standard stays exactly the same.

Engineer

Features scoped tightly enough to ship inside your review bar, every time.

The right first hire when your seniors already set the standard.

$2,700–3,400per month

Senior

The hard module nobody else wants to own, taken end to end.

Ownership of a surface, without adding a manager to your headcount.

$3,700–4,700per month

Lead

The workstream's decisions, made daily, so nothing waits on a meeting.

One accountable voice for a pod or initiative that can't afford to drift.

$5,000–6,200per month

  • Azure engineer

    3 yrs · US East overlap

    Diagnosed an inconsistent MFA rollout to a specific set of conditional-access policy gaps

    • Azure
    • Bicep
    • Entra ID
  • Senior Azure engineer

    7 yrs · UK + EU hours

    Traced a tripled Azure bill to an orphaned resource group nobody remembered creating

    • Azure
    • AKS
    • Cost Management
    • PowerShell
  • Lead Azure engineer

    10 yrs · EU + US split

    Owns the hybrid architecture connecting an on-premises core to two Azure regions

    • Azure
    • Architecture
    • ExpressRoute
    • RBAC

Indicative ranges, representative profiles. Exact figures and named engineers arrive with your shortlist.

Weighing this against a freelancer, a direct hire or a marketplace? See the honest comparison

03From stated problem to first change

Four steps, each closing on evidence.

What gets tested here is your actual tenant, not a certification badge. Each step ends in evidence, and stopping early costs you nothing.

  1. Define the platform problem

    We map where your tenant's identity rules or infrastructure discipline are actually under strain. The brief names that gap, not a list of Azure services to know.

    A brief your leads sign
  2. Match against your tenant

    Candidates are screened against your actual identity setup, your hybrid architecture and your review culture. Three engineers who understand your tenant beat thirty who list Azure certifications.

    Three fits, not thirty CVs
  3. Assess on the real tasks

    Bring your own engineers to the identity-diagnosis and platform-choice exercises. What you see is judgement under real constraints, not a memorised certification talking point.

    Evaluation you can watch
  4. Onboard inside your process

    Access, standards and a first bounded change to real infrastructure. If the engineer ever leaves, continuity cover keeps the transition off your plate entirely.

    A merged change in week one

04Evidence and proof

Engineers who kept the tenant coherent.

Azure proof is drift caught before it becomes cost or risk, not a portal screenshot. Every record here waits for written client approval before production.

Explore case studies
An Azure cost spike traced and resolved.
Vela Ledger · Fintech SaaS, EU

A cost spike traced to a forgotten resource group, not a new workload.

Vela Ledger's Azure bill tripled without a corresponding growth in usage, and nobody could explain why. An embedded Azure engineer traced it to an orphaned resource group nobody remembered creating, still running in a dev subscription.

Monthly cost after fix
Cut sharply
Time to root cause
Under one week
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of a CTO discussing Azure identity access.

He found an Entra conditional-access gap that would have let a departed contractor keep access for months.

Daniel MercerCTO, Vela Ledger
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of an operations director reviewing Azure infrastructure as code.

The Bicep templates she wrote finally let us reproduce an environment that had only ever existed by accident.

Mei TanakaDirector of Operations, Tern
Sample · pending client approval

05Three shapes, one standard

Add an engineer, a cloud pod, or a practice.

Most teams start with one engineer working inside an existing tenant. Some need a pod that owns the whole Azure footprint. If shipping a coherent platform matters more than filling a seat, we point you to the practice instead.

  • One named engineer

    A single Azure specialist inside your direction and your reviews. The smallest commitment, and where most engagements begin.

    Team extension
  • A cloud pod

    A pod with its own lead that owns your Azure footprint end to end, identity included. You set priorities while the pod carries delivery.

    Delivery pods
  • The practice, not the person

    If shipping a coherent platform matters more than filling a seat, data and cloud engineering carries that responsibility instead.

    Data & Cloud

06Straight answers

Asked before an Azure hire is signed.

What does an Azure engineer actually do day to day?

Designs identity and access rules, keeps infrastructure defined in code instead of clicked together, and manages hybrid connections between Azure and on-premises systems. The unglamorous majority of the work is catching drift before it becomes cost or risk.

Do you hire for a specific Azure certification level?

Certifications are a starting signal, not the evaluation. The tasks above test judgement about your actual tenant, which is what the certification alone cannot show.

Can we run our own interviews as well?

Yes, the published tasks are built to be reused directly. Several clients now run the identity-diagnosis exercise themselves in later hiring rounds.

How fast can an Azure engineer start?

A shortlist arrives within days from a bench evaluated continuously. Real start speed after that tracks your own tenant access and approval process.

Who manages the engineer day to day?

Direction stays with your leads, exactly as it would for any hire. We carry the overhead around that instead: continuity, payroll, replacement risk and the transitions in between.

What if the engineer is not the right fit?

Say so early and the replacement costs you nothing. The next candidate is walked through what specifically missed, so a second miss is uncommon.

Do your Azure developers use AI tools?

Yes, openly. AI drafts Bicep templates and pipeline scaffolding quickly; the engineer stays accountable for every identity decision, cost tradeoff and merge that reaches your tenant.

How does pricing work for a hired Azure engineer?

Expect the range in the bands above; the shortlist fixes the specific number per engineer. Monthly billing, no fee before an interview, and a notice period at exit.