For AI features that survive contact with real users, not just a demo

Hire AI Engineers

An AI feature that impresses in a demo can still hallucinate, drift or blow through its inference budget once real users touch it. These engineers are tested on catching those exact failure modes. They are then placed to keep your AI features honest once they leave the demo.

  • Profiles typically within two business days
  • Replacement Assurance: If an engineer is not the right fit, a replacement from our own team starts within ten business days of your request, at no extra cost
  • You interview before placement if you want to
  • At least four hours a day inside your core working hours. Two hours plus a daily written handover for the US West Coast
  • 14-Day Risk-Free Trial: For your first engineer on a time-and-materials engagement. Up to 14 calendar days or 80 logged working hours, whichever comes first. End within the trial and pay nothing for trial hours. Continue beyond it and those hours are billed at the agreed rate. Unpaid trial work remains ours if you stop
Evaluation published, not promisedReplacement is our cost, not yoursAI augmented, human governedEvidence before estimatesYour IP from day oneOne accountable owner per engagementFounded in 2011. Part of the Vinove Group500+ full-time engineers, as of September 2026NASSCOM member
Watch · the 90-second brief

How we evaluate an AI engineer

The tasks, the signals and the onboarding, walked through by the people who run them.

90 secWatch without filling in a form.
Engineers reviewing an AI evaluation harness together.90 secSample frame · video pending

01Published, not promised

The assessment behind every engineer we send.

The AI engineering bar is published, not assumed: five competencies, the exact task behind each, and the shortcut that ends a candidacy. Most interviews ask about which model someone has used. This one asks whether the feature can be trusted.

What we listen forWhether they can measure quality objectively, not just eyeball a few outputs.

The task we set

A team ships an LLM feature with no way to know whether a prompt change made it better or worse. Propose an evaluation approach.

What strong sounds like
Proposes a concrete evaluation set with measurable criteria before touching the prompt, treating quality as something to test, not sense.
What gives us pause
Proposes trying the new prompt on a handful of examples and comparing outputs by eye.
Core

Python · PyTorch · LangChain

LLM

OpenAI API · Anthropic API · Vector Databases

Evaluation

Eval Frameworks · A/B Testing · Human Review

Tooling

MLflow · Weights & Biases · Docker

02Who you actually meet

The bench, priced by seniority.

Three seniority tiers, priced honestly, and the engineers who fill each one today. Real names and photos take their place as soon as we can share them, and the standard stays exactly the same.

Engineer

Features scoped tightly enough to ship inside your review bar, every time.

The right first hire when your seniors already set the standard.

$3,000–3,800per month

Senior

The hard module nobody else wants to own, taken end to end.

Ownership of a surface, without adding a manager to your headcount.

$4,100–5,200per month

Lead

The workstream's decisions, made daily, so nothing waits on a meeting.

One accountable voice for a pod or initiative that can't afford to drift.

$5,500–6,900per month

  • AI engineer

    3 yrs · US East overlap

    Built an evaluation set that caught a prompt regression before it reached production

    • Python
    • LangChain
    • OpenAI API
  • Senior AI engineer

    7 yrs · UK + EU hours

    Cut an AI feature's inference cost in half without a measurable quality drop

    • PyTorch
    • Vector Databases
    • MLflow
  • Lead AI engineer

    10 yrs · EU + US split

    Owns the evaluation and guardrail standard three product teams now build against

    • Architecture
    • Evals
    • Anthropic API
    • Observability

Indicative ranges, representative profiles. Exact figures and named engineers arrive with your shortlist.

Weighing this against a freelancer, a direct hire or a marketplace? See the honest comparison

03From stated problem to first change

Four steps, each closing on evidence.

The evaluation below tests judgement about production AI, not familiarity with a specific model's API. Stopping at any point along the way costs you nothing.

  1. Define the reliability problem

    We map where your AI feature's evaluation, guardrails or cost are actually unproven. The brief names that gap, not a list of models to know.

    A brief your leads sign
  2. Match against your system

    Candidates are screened against your actual model choices, your data sensitivity and your review culture. Three engineers who understand your system beat thirty who list LLM experience.

    Three fits, not thirty CVs
  3. Assess on the real tasks

    Your team can watch the evaluation-harness and guardrail-design exercises directly. What shows up is engineering judgement, not enthusiasm about a particular model.

    Evaluation you can watch
  4. Onboard inside your process

    Access, standards and a first bounded improvement to a real AI feature. Continuity cover keeps a departure from ever becoming your emergency.

    A merged change in week one

04Evidence and proof

Engineers who kept the AI feature honest after launch.

AI proof is quality that holds after launch, not a demo that only worked once. Every record here waits for written client approval before production.

Explore case studies
An AI support assistant fixed to stop ungrounded answers.
Koru Health · Healthcare product, US

A support assistant that stopped confidently making things up.

Koru Health's support assistant occasionally answered questions using information that was not in its source documents. An embedded AI engineer traced the gap to a retrieval failure and fixed the grounding before the next release.

Ungrounded answers
Eliminated
Time to root cause
Under one week
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of a CTO discussing AI evaluation design.

He built an evaluation set that caught a prompt regression before it ever reached users.

Daniel MercerCTO, Vela Ledger
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of a product VP discussing AI inference cost.

Our inference costs dropped by half without anyone noticing a change in quality.

Anika RaoVP Product, Koru Health
Sample · pending client approval

05Three shapes, one standard

Add an engineer, an AI pod, or a practice.

Most teams start with one engineer strengthening an existing AI feature. Some need a pod that owns AI reliability across the product. Where building and shipping an AI capability outright matters more than staffing a role, we point you to the practice instead.

  • One named engineer

    A single AI specialist inside your direction and your reviews. The smallest commitment, and the way most engagements begin.

    Team extension
  • An AI pod

    A pod with its own lead that owns evaluation, guardrails and cost across every AI feature you ship. You set priorities while the pod carries delivery.

    Delivery pods
  • The practice, not the person

    Where building and shipping an AI capability outright matters more than staffing a role, AI & Automation takes on that delivery instead.

    AI & Automation

06Straight answers

Asked before an AI engineering hire is signed.

What does an AI engineer actually do day to day?

Designs evaluation harnesses, builds guardrails against real failure modes, and keeps inference cost and latency proportional to actual value delivered. The unglamorous majority of the work is proving a feature still works after it ships, not building it the first time.

Do you hire for a specific model provider?

Matched to your actual stack. Evaluation and guardrail judgement transfers across OpenAI, Anthropic and open models, then the evaluation confirms familiarity with whichever you run.

Can we run our own interviews as well?

Yes, the published tasks are built to be reused directly. Several clients now run the guardrail-design exercise themselves in later hiring rounds.

How fast can an AI engineer start?

A shortlist arrives within days from a bench evaluated continuously. Real start speed after that tracks how quickly your side can grant system and data access.

Who manages the engineer day to day?

Your leads set priorities and hold the quality bar. What we carry sits behind the person: continuity, payroll, replacement risk and the handoff work if plans change.

What if the engineer is not the right fit?

Say so inside the first weeks and the replacement costs you nothing. The next engineer arrives briefed on the specific gap, which keeps a second miss rare.

Do your AI engineers use AI coding tools themselves?

Yes, for scaffolding code and test cases. The AI systems they build for you are a separate matter entirely, governed by the evaluation and guardrails above, not by how the code itself was drafted.

How does pricing work for a hired AI engineer?

Pricing follows the tier bands above, with the shortlist fixing the exact number once scope is clear. Billing runs monthly per engineer, with no placement fee and notice-period exit terms.