AI that survives contact with production

AI & Automation

Most AI initiatives die between the demo and the production system, where accuracy, cost and accountability suddenly matter. This practice exists for that gap. Six AI capabilities under one evaluation-first discipline, from the first ranked use case to models watched in production.

Evaluation before enthusiasmNo unmeasured claim shipsAI augmented, human governedEvidence before estimatesYour IP from day oneOne accountable owner per engagementFounded in 2011. Part of the Vinove Group500+ full-time engineers, as of September 2026NASSCOM member
Watch · the 90-second brief

Governed AI, briefly explained

How evaluation-first delivery takes an AI case from idea to watched production.

90 secWatch without filling in a form.
A governed AI feature moving through evaluation to production.90 secSample frame · video pending

01Six practices, one honest question

Start from where AI actually stands today.

AI vendors love to start from their technology. This map starts from your position. Say where AI sits on your roadmap and the practices that fit rise with a reason attached, whether that is a first ranked use case or a production model nobody currently owns. When two situations apply at once, begin with the one closest to revenue.

02Evaluation before enthusiasm

Measured at every step, or not shipped.

AI work fails quietly, which is why this system refuses unmeasured claims. Each engagement moves through the same four gates, and each gate closes with evidence a sceptical stakeholder can inspect. Enthusiasm is free. Evidence is the deliverable. Every gate doubles as a safe exit, so a weak case can die cheaply at any point in the journey.

  1. Find the case worth funding

    Workshops rank candidate uses by value, feasibility and risk against your data reality. Weak cases are killed on paper, where killing them is cheap. The survivors arrive costed, with the data work each one needs stated up front.

    A case with a number attached
  2. Prove it before scaling it

    A thin working version runs against your actual data and your quality bar. Accuracy, cost per call and failure modes are measured, not estimated. What the proof learns reshapes the case before serious money moves.

    A proof on your real data
  3. Ship with control designed in

    Human checkpoints, permission boundaries, fallbacks and logging are engineered into the product. Enterprise ai development services earn trust here or nowhere, and the control design is documented for your risk owners.

    Guardrails an auditor accepts
  4. Operate it like software

    Live models get monitoring for drift, spend and quality, plus a review cadence. AI that nobody watches becomes a liability on a schedule, so ownership is assigned before launch rather than after the first incident.

    A model with a named owner

03Evidence and proof

AI that is still running a year later.

The proof standard for this practice is production evidence: measured accuracy, measured cost and a client willing to sign the numbers. These previews show that standard while written approvals are collected.

Explore case studies
A governed AI answer path from query to resolved ticket.
Tern · Logistics SaaS, EU

A support copilot that answered 6 in 10 tickets, safely.

Tern needed deflection without hallucinated refunds. Retrieval over governed content, confidence thresholds and human handoff shipped in one quarter.

Tickets resolved without escalation
6 in 10
Answer accuracy at launch
Measured weekly
Sample · pending client approval
Clinical documents moving through a verified extraction pipeline.
Koru Health · Care platform, US

Document intake automated with an auditable trail.

Koru Health processed clinical intake forms by hand. Extraction models with human verification checkpoints cut the queue while keeping every decision reviewable.

Manual intake effort
Cut by two thirds
Decisions with audit trail
All of them
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of a technology executive reviewing model metrics.

Every vendor showed us demos. This team showed us our own error rate, then made it fall for six straight weeks.

Daniel MercerCTO, Vela Ledger
Sample · pending client approval

04Three ways to engage the practice

Match the door to your risk appetite.

Some teams want a decision, some want a product carried, some want AI engineers inside their own process. All three doors lead to the same delivery discipline, so the choice is about who steers, never about quality. The smallest door is a scoping engagement that prices the decision before anyone commits to a build. The doors also combine well, and many clients scope first before commissioning anything.

  • Scope the AI decision

    A short priced engagement that turns AI pressure into a ranked case list, an architecture and a number the board can approve or refuse.

    Project Scoping
  • Commission the build

    One accountable team takes a proven case to production, with evaluation, guardrails and operations included rather than sold separately later.

    AI Software Development
  • Add AI engineers to your team

    Engineers who have shipped models join your reviews and standards, bringing the discipline without replacing your process.

    Hire AI Engineers

05Straight answers

Asked before AI budgets get signed.

How do we know if our use case is realistic?

Bring it to a scoping conversation and it gets tested against three things: the value if it works, the state of your data, and the tolerance for error in that workflow. Most cases fail on the second or third test, which is exactly why testing them on paper first is the cheapest step in the whole journey.

Do you build on OpenAI, open-source models or our own?

Whichever the case justifies. Hosted frontier models win when quality matters most and data terms allow them. Open-source or fine-tuned models win on cost, latency or data residency. The choice is recorded with its trade-offs, so you can revisit it as the model market moves.

How is hallucination risk actually handled?

Through architecture rather than hope. Retrieval grounds answers in your approved content, confidence thresholds route weak answers to humans, and evaluation suites measure failure modes before and after every change. Where the workflow cannot tolerate error, the design keeps a person in the loop by construction.

What does AI development cost?

A scoping engagement is fixed-price and small. Build work is priced against the proven case, and running costs are modelled per call before you commit, because inference spend is a real line item. An ai development company that will not discuss unit economics is selling you a demo.

Can you work with our compliance and security constraints?

Constraints are collected before architecture, not discovered after it. Data residency, retention, access control and audit requirements shape model choice and hosting from the first diagram. Regulated buyers get the evidence pack their auditors ask for as part of delivery.

We already have data scientists. Where do you fit?

Usually on the engineering side of the divide. Your scientists know the models, and the gap tends to be production software, integration and operations. As an ai solutions company we ship the system around the model, and your team keeps the science.

What is the difference between AI consulting and AI development here?

Consulting decides what deserves to exist and proves it on paper: ranked cases, feasibility against your data, and a costed recommendation. Development engineers the chosen case into production software. They are staffed as one practice, so nothing gets lost in the handoff between the deck and the codebase, and the consultants stay accountable for what the builders inherit.

How fast can a first AI project deliver?

A ranked case list arrives in weeks. A working proof on your data typically lands within the first quarter, and it is designed to grow into the product rather than be thrown away. Speed comes from starting narrow, never from skipping evaluation.