Fourteen industries, one engineering standard

Industries

Every sector runs on software, but each one breaks in a different place: a regulator, a warehouse floor, a traffic spike, a patient outcome. This index routes to the practice built for your sector's actual pressure, not a generic industry page repeating the same promises.

AI augmented, human governedEvidence before estimatesYour IP from day oneOne accountable owner per engagementFounded in 2011. Part of the Vinove Group500+ full-time engineers, as of September 2026NASSCOM member

01Start from the sector, not the service

Choose the pressure your sector feels.

A regulator, a physical operation, a consumer platform or a patient and student outcome each shape software differently, so the fastest route starts with the sector, not a features list. Pick the pressure below and the map narrows to the hubs built for it.

02One delivery system across fourteen sectors

The rigor changes by sector, the process does not.

Every industry practice runs the same delivery process underneath its sector-specific rigor. Name the risk, design the architecture around it, build with the right domain experts in the loop, then release with the evidence that sector's stakeholders expect. The risk changes by sector. The discipline applied to it does not.

  1. Name the sector-specific risk first

    A compliance obligation, a safety constraint, a traffic spike or a patient outcome is mapped before any architecture decision, because each sector fails differently.

    A risk map before the sector's own architecture
  2. Design around the real domain constraint

    Whether the constraint is a regulator, a warehouse floor or a live audience, the architecture is shaped by that pressure rather than a generic template.

    Architecture shaped by the domain
  3. Build with the right specialists involved

    Compliance officers, clinicians, operations leads or security engineers join the build at the point their domain actually matters, not as a late review.

    Domain expertise inside the build
  4. Release with the evidence that sector needs

    A release ships with the audit trail, load test or clinical sign-off a given sector's stakeholders would ask for, because generic evidence satisfies nobody.

    Evidence the sector's stakeholders expect

03Evidence and proof

One engineering standard, proven across a dozen sectors.

Cross-sector proof has to show the same discipline holding under different rules. These previews show that standard while written client approvals are collected.

Explore case studies
One engineering standard proven across multiple regulated sectors.
Nexa Foundry · Industrial manufacturing, EU

One delivery standard proven across three different regulatory regimes.

Nexa Foundry runs manufacturing, logistics and compliance-adjacent systems under a single engineering partner. The same delivery discipline that passed a manufacturing safety audit also cleared a logistics data review months later.

Sectors served under one standard
3
Audits passed
All
Sample · pending client approval
A cross-industry product team consolidated onto one delivery standard.
Cross-industry product team · Sample engagement, US

A cross-industry product team that stopped re-explaining its stack.

A multi-brand operator ran retail, logistics and subscription products through three unrelated vendors. Consolidating delivery under one engineering standard cut onboarding time for every new product line.

Vendors consolidated
3 to 1
New product onboarding
Faster
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of an operations director overseeing multi-sector delivery.

Every sector we operate in has different rules, and they never made us explain that twice.

Mei TanakaDirector of Operations, Tern
Sample · pending client approval

04Three doors before you pick a sector

Start here if you're not sure which hub fits.

Not every buyer arrives already knowing their sector's hub. Some need help defining the problem itself, some need a broad engineering partner regardless of sector, and some are choosing where AI safely fits their specific domain. Every door below still leads back to sector-specific rigor once the picture is clear.

  • Scope the problem before choosing a hub

    A priced scoping engagement that maps the sector, the constraint and the architecture before any hub gets picked.

    Project Scoping
  • Commission a custom system regardless of sector

    Custom engineering for workflows no packaged product covers, under whichever sector's governance applies.

    Custom Software Development
  • Find where AI fits your domain safely

    The AI practice applied under each sector's real constraints, with evaluation evidence before any claim ships.

    AI & Automation

05Straight answers

Asked before choosing a sector hub.

How many industries does this practice actually cover?

Fourteen sector hubs today, each with its own situations, proof and deeper routes where the sector supports them. The list keeps growing as a sector's demand and the practice's own evidence justify a dedicated hub.

Do you specialize or generalize across industries?

Both, deliberately. A shared engineering discipline runs underneath every hub, while each sector gets specialists who know its regulation, failure modes and buyers, not a generalist reading a brief for the first time.

What if my sector isn't one of the fourteen hubs?

Custom software development and project scoping work regardless of sector, and the same delivery discipline applies. Tell us the sector and the constraint, and we will say honestly whether deep domain expertise already exists here.

How do you choose the right hub for my business?

Start from the pressure you actually feel: a regulator, a physical operation, a consumer platform or an outcome that has to be right. That pressure usually points to one hub faster than a list of technologies would.

Can one engagement span more than one industry?

Often, especially for a fintech lending product, a retail logistics operation or an insurance claims platform touching several domains at once. The relevant hubs and practices are combined rather than forced into a single generic scope.

Do sector specialists actually join the engineering team?

Yes, where the domain genuinely changes the engineering: compliance officers, clinicians, operations leads or security engineers join at the point their expertise matters. They are not a review step bolted on at the end.

How does pricing differ between industries?

By the regulatory and operational surface each sector carries, not by an industry markup. A compliance-heavy build costs more to engineer honestly than a low-risk one, and scoping shows that difference before you commit.

Where should I start if I'm not sure which hub fits?

Project scoping, since it maps your actual sector, constraint and architecture before anything else commits. That map either confirms the hub you expected or points somewhere you had not considered yet.