For releases that have to pass review and hold up in the wild

Hire iOS Developers

An iOS app can look flawless in the simulator and still leak memory, stutter on an older device, or get rejected on review for a background mode nobody flagged in testing. These engineers are tested against those exact failure points, then placed to carry your app through the parts of shipping that are easy to miss.

  • Profiles typically within two business days
  • Replacement Assurance: If an engineer is not the right fit, a replacement from our own team starts within ten business days of your request, at no extra cost
  • You interview before placement if you want to
  • At least four hours a day inside your core working hours. Two hours plus a daily written handover for the US West Coast
  • 14-Day Risk-Free Trial: For your first engineer on a time-and-materials engagement. Up to 14 calendar days or 80 logged working hours, whichever comes first. End within the trial and pay nothing for trial hours. Continue beyond it and those hours are billed at the agreed rate. Unpaid trial work remains ours if you stop
Releases that pass review the first timeReplacement is our cost, not yoursAI augmented, human governedEvidence before estimatesYour IP from day oneOne accountable owner per engagementFounded in 2011. Part of the Vinove Group500+ full-time engineers, as of September 2026NASSCOM member
Watch · the 90-second brief

How we evaluate an iOS engineer

The tasks, the signals and the onboarding, walked through by the people who run them.

90 secWatch without filling in a form.
Engineers reviewing an iOS release together.90 secSample frame · video pending

01Published, not promised

The assessment behind every engineer we send.

The iOS bar is published, not assumed: five competencies, the exact task behind each, and the shortcut that ends a candidacy. Most interviews ask about SwiftUI trivia. This one asks whether the release actually survives contact with a user.

What we listen forWhether they can trace a retain cycle, not just recognise the term.

The task we set

A view controller never deallocates after being dismissed, and memory climbs a little on every visit to that screen. Diagnose why.

What strong sounds like
Traces the specific strong reference cycle, commonly a closure or delegate, and proposes a weak or unowned fix with the reasoning shown.
What gives us pause
Suggests calling a manual cleanup method on dismiss instead of finding and breaking the actual retain cycle.
Core

Swift · UIKit · SwiftUI

Frameworks

Combine · Core Data · CloudKit

Testing

XCTest · XCUITest · Instruments

Tooling

Xcode · TestFlight · Fastlane

02Who you actually meet

The bench, priced by seniority.

Three seniority tiers, priced honestly, and the engineers who fill each one today. Real names and photos take their place as soon as we can share them, and the standard stays exactly the same.

Engineer

Features scoped tightly enough to ship inside your review bar, every time.

The right first hire when your seniors already set the standard.

$2,600–3,300per month

Senior

The hard module nobody else wants to own, taken end to end.

Ownership of a surface, without adding a manager to your headcount.

$3,600–4,600per month

Lead

The workstream's decisions, made daily, so nothing waits on a meeting.

One accountable voice for a pod or initiative that can't afford to drift.

$4,900–6,100per month

  • iOS engineer

    3 yrs · US East overlap

    Traced a retain cycle that had been quietly growing memory use across three releases

    • Swift
    • UIKit
    • XCTest
  • Senior iOS engineer

    7 yrs · UK + EU hours

    Diagnosed and fixed the background-refresh issue behind two consecutive App Store rejections

    • Swift
    • SwiftUI
    • Combine
    • Instruments
  • Lead iOS engineer

    11 yrs · EU + US split

    Owns the release process across two apps with a clean App Store review record

    • Swift
    • Architecture
    • Fastlane
    • CloudKit

Indicative ranges, representative profiles. Exact figures and named engineers arrive with your shortlist.

Weighing this against a freelancer, a direct hire or a marketplace? See the honest comparison

03From stated problem to first change

Four steps, each closing on evidence.

Each step here is built around what a release actually needs to survive, not a list of Apple frameworks. You can stop after any of them owing us nothing at all.

  1. Define the release problem

    We map where your app's stability, performance or review readiness is actually at risk. The brief names that gap, not a list of Apple frameworks to know.

    A brief your leads sign
  2. Match against your app

    Candidates are screened against your actual architecture, your minimum iOS version and your review culture. Three engineers who understand your constraints beat thirty who list Swift on a CV.

    Three fits, not thirty CVs
  3. Assess on the real tasks

    Bring your own engineers to the memory-diagnosis and Instruments exercises. Judgement under real release pressure is visible here, not a rehearsed demo.

    Evaluation you can watch
  4. Onboard inside your process

    Access, standards and a first bounded fix shipped to TestFlight. Continuity cover means a departure lands on our desk before it reaches your release date.

    A merged change in week one

04Evidence and proof

Engineers who got the release through, clean.

iOS proof is a release that passes review and holds up on real devices, not a simulator demo. Every record here waits for written client approval before production.

Explore case studies
An iOS app approved on App Store review after a compliance fix.
Vela Ledger · Fintech SaaS, EU

A rejected build that shipped clean on the second review.

Vela Ledger's background-refresh feature was rejected twice in App Store review before an embedded iOS engineer diagnosed the actual policy conflict and rebuilt it to comply.

App Store rejections
Zero after fix
Time to compliant rebuild
One sprint
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of a CTO discussing an iOS memory fix.

He found the retain cycle that had been quietly growing our memory footprint for three releases.

Daniel MercerCTO, Vela Ledger
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of a product VP discussing App Store approval.

The App Store rejection that had stumped us twice got fixed and approved on the first resubmission.

Anika RaoVP Product, Koru Health
Sample · pending client approval

05Three shapes, one standard

Add an engineer, a mobile pod, or a practice.

Most teams begin with a single engineer working inside the existing app. Some need a pod that owns the full release process instead. When shipping matters more than staffing a seat, the practice is the honest answer.

  • One named engineer

    A single iOS specialist inside your direction and your reviews. The smallest commitment, and where most engagements begin.

    Team extension
  • A mobile pod

    A pod with its own lead that owns the iOS app end to end, App Store submissions included. You set priorities while the pod carries delivery.

    Delivery pods
  • The practice, not the person

    If what you need is an app delivered end to end rather than a seat filled, mobile app development carries that accountability instead.

    Mobile app development

06Straight answers

Asked before an iOS hire is signed.

What does an iOS engineer actually do day to day?

Manages view controller lifecycle and memory correctness, keeps background behaviour inside App Store policy, and profiles performance on devices older than the newest iPhone. The unglamorous majority of the work is the release process itself, not new feature code.

Do you hire for SwiftUI or UIKit specifically?

Matched to your actual codebase. Lifecycle and memory judgement transfers across both, then the evaluation confirms familiarity with whichever your app runs.

Can we run our own interviews as well?

Yes, the published tasks are built to be reused directly. Several clients now run the Instruments-profiling exercise themselves in later hiring rounds.

How fast can an iOS engineer start?

A shortlist arrives within days from a bench evaluated continuously. Real start speed after that tracks your own repository and App Store Connect access process.

Who manages the engineer day to day?

Your leads set the release calendar and hold the review bar. We carry what sits underneath: continuity, payroll, replacement risk and the handoff work when something has to change.

What if the engineer is not the right fit?

Say so within the first weeks and the replacement is our cost. The next candidate is briefed on exactly what went wrong, so a second miss is rare.

Do your iOS developers use AI coding tools?

Yes, openly. AI drafts boilerplate views and test scaffolding quickly; the engineer stays accountable for every memory decision, lifecycle boundary and merge that reaches your app.

How does pricing work for a hired iOS engineer?

Pricing follows the tier bands above, confirmed exactly once the shortlist arrives. No placement fee, monthly billing per engineer, and a notice period instead of a contract term.