For fleets that survive a dropout and their own update

Hire IoT Developers

A device that behaves perfectly on a bench can still lose data the moment connectivity drops or brick itself during a routine firmware push. These developers are tested on catching that exact fragility before it reaches the field. They are then placed to keep a whole fleet reliable as it keeps scaling.

  • Profiles typically within two business days
  • Replacement Assurance: If an engineer is not the right fit, a replacement from our own team starts within ten business days of your request, at no extra cost
  • You interview before placement if you want to
  • At least four hours a day inside your core working hours. Two hours plus a daily written handover for the US West Coast
  • 14-Day Risk-Free Trial: For your first engineer on a time-and-materials engagement. Up to 14 calendar days or 80 logged working hours, whichever comes first. End within the trial and pay nothing for trial hours. Continue beyond it and those hours are billed at the agreed rate. Unpaid trial work remains ours if you stop
Reliable past the point of intermittent signalReplacement is our cost, not yoursAI augmented, human governedEvidence before estimatesYour IP from day oneOne accountable owner per engagementFounded in 2011. Part of the Vinove Group500+ full-time engineers, as of September 2026NASSCOM member
Watch · the 90-second brief

How we evaluate an IoT developer

The tasks, the signals and the onboarding, walked through by the people who run them.

90 secWatch without filling in a form.
Developers reviewing a connected device fleet dashboard together.90 secSample frame · video pending

01Published, not promised

The assessment behind every developer we send.

The IoT bar is published, not assumed: five competencies, the exact task behind each, and the shortcut that ends a candidacy. Most interviews ask about a specific board or chipset. This one asks whether a fleet survives its own firmware update.

What we listen forWhether they design for the dropout, not assume a stable link.

The task we set

Devices in the field lose connectivity for hours at a time, and sensor readings taken during that gap are currently lost entirely. Propose a fix.

What strong sounds like
Proposes local buffering with store-and-forward sync, so readings taken during a dropout are queued and delivered once connectivity returns.
What gives us pause
Proposes increasing the transmission retry frequency without adding any local buffering for the data lost during the dropout.
Core

MQTT · FreeRTOS · AWS IoT Core

Protocols

CoAP · LwM2M · Zigbee

Provisioning

X.509 Certificates · Zero-Touch Provisioning · Device Shadow

Updates

OTA Updates · Delta Patching · Rollback Design

02Who you actually meet

The bench, priced by seniority.

Three seniority tiers, priced honestly, and the engineers who fill each one today. Real names and photos take their place as soon as we can share them, and the standard stays exactly the same.

Engineer

Features scoped tightly enough to ship inside your review bar, every time.

The right first hire when your seniors already set the standard.

$2,100–2,800per month

Senior

The hard module nobody else wants to own, taken end to end.

Ownership of a surface, without adding a manager to your headcount.

$3,000–3,800per month

Lead

The workstream's decisions, made daily, so nothing waits on a meeting.

One accountable voice for a pod or initiative that can't afford to drift.

$4,100–5,200per month

  • IoT developer

    3 yrs · US East overlap

    Rebuilt a device's reconnection logic after intermittent connectivity was silently dropping telemetry data

    • MQTT
    • FreeRTOS
    • Edge Compute
  • Senior IoT developer

    6 yrs · UK + EU hours

    Designed a fleet provisioning system that safely rolled out an update to thousands of devices

    • Fleet Management
    • OTA Updates
    • AWS IoT Core
  • Lead IoT architect

    9 yrs · EU + US split

    Owns the protocol-security standard applied across a fleet of resource-constrained field devices

    • Architecture
    • CoAP
    • Power-Constrained Design

Indicative ranges, representative profiles. Exact figures and named engineers arrive with your shortlist.

Weighing this against a freelancer, a direct hire or a marketplace? See the honest comparison

03From stated problem to first change

Four steps, each closing on evidence.

This sequence tests judgement about real fleet constraints, not familiarity with one hardware platform. Stopping at any point along the way owes us nothing.

  1. Define the fleet problem

    We map where your devices are actually fragile, unmanaged or hard to update safely. The brief names that gap, not a list of chipsets to know.

    A brief your hardware lead signs
  2. Match against your fleet

    Candidates are screened against your actual device constraints, connectivity pattern and fleet size. Three developers who understand your fleet beat thirty who list an SDK on a CV.

    Three fits, not thirty CVs
  3. Assess on the real tasks

    Your team can watch the connectivity-resilience and OTA-rollback exercises directly. What shows up is judgement about constrained devices, not a rehearsed demo board.

    Evaluation you can watch
  4. Onboard inside your fleet

    Access, standards and a first bounded fleet improvement shipped for real. Continuity cover keeps a departure from leaving devices stranded mid-rollout.

    A provisioned device in week one

04Evidence and proof

Developers who kept a fleet running through a bad update.

IoT proof is a fleet that survived its own update, not a single demo device on a bench. Every record here waits for written client approval before production.

Explore case studies
A staged over-the-air rollout design with automatic rollback.
Aster North · Product SaaS, US

The firmware update that stopped bricking devices in the field.

Aster North pushed a firmware update to its entire connected fleet at once, and a batch of devices had to be physically retrieved after the update bricked them. An embedded IoT developer rebuilt the rollout as a staged canary with automatic rollback on failed health checks.

Devices bricked per update
None, going forward
Rollout method
Staged, with automatic rollback
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of an operations director discussing IoT connectivity resilience.

He built store-and-forward buffering so we stopped losing sensor readings every time a device dropped offline.

Mei TanakaDirector of Operations, Tern
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of a CTO discussing zero-touch device provisioning.

He automated device provisioning so onboarding a thousand units stopped meaning a thousand manual flashes.

Daniel MercerCTO, Vela Ledger
Sample · pending client approval

05Three shapes, one standard

Add a developer, a device pod, or a practice.

Most teams start with one developer hardening connectivity and update safety first. Some need a pod that owns provisioning and fleet management end to end. Where the whole connected-device platform matters more than one seat, we point you to the practice instead.

  • One named developer

    A single IoT specialist inside your direction and your review process. The smallest commitment, and the natural first step.

    Team extension
  • A device pod

    A pod with its own lead that owns provisioning, OTA safety and fleet management end to end. You set priorities while the pod carries delivery.

    Delivery pods
  • The practice, not the person

    Connected-device platforms here sit inside the same practice as cloud ingestion, so when the whole fleet platform matters most, data and cloud engineering takes it on.

    Data & Cloud

06Straight answers

Asked before an IoT hire is signed.

What does an IoT developer actually do day to day?

Designs firmware that survives a connectivity dropout, builds provisioning that scales past a handful of devices, and rolls out updates safely with automatic rollback. Working within a real power and memory budget runs through nearly all of it.

Do you hire for a specific IoT platform or protocol?

Matched to your actual constraints. Connectivity and provisioning judgement transfers across MQTT, CoAP and the major cloud IoT platforms, then the evaluation confirms fluency with whichever you run.

Can we run our own interviews as well?

Yes, the published tasks are built to be reused directly. Several clients now run the OTA-rollback exercise themselves in later hiring rounds.

How fast can an IoT developer start?

A shortlist arrives within days from a bench evaluated continuously. Actual start speed after that depends on how quickly your side can grant fleet and device access.

Who manages the engineer day to day?

Your hardware lead sets fleet priorities and signs off on rollout plans. The employment side sits with us, covering payroll and continuity if plans change unexpectedly.

What if the engineer is not the right fit?

A mismatch caught early is replaced free, no extra paperwork on your side. We carry the specific reason forward so the next IoT developer does not repeat it.

Do your IoT developers use AI coding tools?

Yes, to draft first-pass firmware modules and provisioning scripts quickly. The developer still owns every power budget decision and rollback design that ships to the fleet.

How does pricing work for a hired IoT developer?

Treat the range as a planning tool; the shortlist locks in the real number after scope is confirmed. Monthly billing, no placement fee, notice-period exit only.