For bots that keep running after something changes

Hire RPA Developers

A bot that runs perfectly in testing can still freeze the first time a vendor moves a button or a queue backs up overnight. These developers are tested on catching that exact fragility before it reaches production. They are then placed to keep automation resilient as the systems around it keep changing.

  • Profiles typically within two business days
  • Replacement Assurance: If an engineer is not the right fit, a replacement from our own team starts within ten business days of your request, at no extra cost
  • You interview before placement if you want to
  • At least four hours a day inside your core working hours. Two hours plus a daily written handover for the US West Coast
  • 14-Day Risk-Free Trial: For your first engineer on a time-and-materials engagement. Up to 14 calendar days or 80 logged working hours, whichever comes first. End within the trial and pay nothing for trial hours. Continue beyond it and those hours are billed at the agreed rate. Unpaid trial work remains ours if you stop
Bots that survive a UI changeReplacement is our cost, not yoursAI augmented, human governedEvidence before estimatesYour IP from day oneOne accountable owner per engagementFounded in 2011. Part of the Vinove Group500+ full-time engineers, as of September 2026NASSCOM member
Watch · the 90-second brief

How we evaluate an RPA developer

The tasks, the signals and the onboarding, walked through by the people who run them.

90 secWatch without filling in a form.
Developers reviewing an RPA bot workflow together.90 secSample frame · video pending

01Published, not promised

The assessment behind every developer we send.

The RPA bar is published, not assumed: five competencies, the exact task behind each, and the shortcut that ends a candidacy. Most interviews ask which platform someone has clicked through before. This one asks whether a bot survives the next unexpected pop-up.

What we listen forWhether they build for change, not just today's screen layout.

The task we set

A bot that has run reliably for months breaks overnight because a vendor moved a button on their web portal. Diagnose and propose a fix.

What strong sounds like
Proposes resilient selector strategies, such as anchor-based or attribute-based targeting, and adds a check that fails loudly instead of silently mis-clicking.
What gives us pause
Hardcodes a fix for the new button position without addressing why the original selector could not tolerate the layout change.
Core

UiPath · Automation Anywhere · Blue Prism

Resilience

Selector Strategies · Computer Vision · Exception Frameworks

Security

Credential Vaults · CyberArk · Encrypted Assets

Orchestration

Queue-Based Scheduling · Orchestrator · Robotic Process Monitoring

02Who you actually meet

The bench, priced by seniority.

Three seniority tiers, priced honestly, and the engineers who fill each one today. Real names and photos take their place as soon as we can share them, and the standard stays exactly the same.

Engineer

Features scoped tightly enough to ship inside your review bar, every time.

The right first hire when your seniors already set the standard.

$1,900–2,500per month

Senior

The hard module nobody else wants to own, taken end to end.

Ownership of a surface, without adding a manager to your headcount.

$2,700–3,400per month

Lead

The workstream's decisions, made daily, so nothing waits on a meeting.

One accountable voice for a pod or initiative that can't afford to drift.

$3,700–4,600per month

  • RPA developer

    2 yrs · US East overlap

    Rebuilt a bot's selector logic after a UI update silently broke it for a full week unnoticed

    • UiPath
    • Selector Design
    • Exception Handling
  • Senior RPA developer

    5 yrs · UK + EU hours

    Redesigned a bot's exception handling after a silent failure went undetected for days

    • Automation Anywhere
    • Orchestration
    • Queue Design
  • Lead RPA architect

    8 yrs · EU + US split

    Owns the automation-suitability review that stops bots being built for processes that should not be automated

    • Architecture
    • Process Assessment
    • Credential Security

Indicative ranges, representative profiles. Exact figures and named engineers arrive with your shortlist.

Weighing this against a freelancer, a direct hire or a marketplace? See the honest comparison

03From stated problem to first change

Four steps, each closing on evidence.

This sequence is built around your actual process candidates, not a platform certification list. Stopping at any point along the way owes us nothing.

  1. Define the automation problem

    We map which of your processes are actually fragile, unattended or exception-heavy. The brief names that gap, not a list of RPA platforms to know.

    A brief your process owners sign
  2. Match against your platform

    Candidates are screened against your actual RPA platform, your exception volume and your security requirements. Three developers who understand your processes beat thirty who list a platform badge.

    Three fits, not thirty CVs
  3. Assess on the real tasks

    Your team can watch the resilience and exception-handling exercises directly. What shows up is judgement about fragile automation, not a rehearsed platform demo.

    Evaluation you can watch
  4. Onboard inside your process

    Access, standards and a first bounded bot shipped for real. Continuity cover keeps a departure from turning into an unattended process nobody is watching.

    A running bot in week one

04Evidence and proof

Developers who built bots that survive a bad morning.

RPA proof is a bot that kept running after something changed, not a demo recorded on a quiet day. Every record here waits for written client approval before production.

Explore case studies
An RPA exception-handling flow rebuilt for automatic recovery.
Aster North · Product SaaS, US

The invoice bot that stopped freezing at two in the morning.

Aster North's invoice-processing bot kept freezing on an unexpected vendor pop-up, and nobody noticed until the next business day's backlog had already built up. An embedded RPA developer rebuilt the exception handling to recover automatically and alert the team immediately.

Unattended failures reaching morning
None, going forward
Recovery
Automatic, same night
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of a CTO discussing bot credential security.

He moved every credential out of the bot's workflow and into a vault before we even had to ask.

Daniel MercerCTO, Vela Ledger
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of a product VP discussing automation suitability judgement.

She talked us out of automating a process that would have broken every week, and she was right.

Anika RaoVP Product, Koru Health
Sample · pending client approval

05Three shapes, one standard

Add a developer, an automation pod, or a practice.

Most teams start with one developer strengthening bots already in production. Some need a pod that owns bot resilience and orchestration end to end. Where automating a whole operating process matters more than one seat, we point you to the practice instead.

  • One named developer

    A single RPA specialist inside your direction and your review process. The smallest commitment, and the natural first step.

    Team extension
  • An automation pod

    A pod with its own lead that owns bot resilience, exception handling and orchestration end to end. You set priorities while the pod carries delivery.

    Delivery pods
  • The practice, not the person

    When automating a whole operating process outweighs adding one seat, product engineering takes that broader scope on instead.

    Product Engineering

06Straight answers

Asked before an RPA hire is signed.

What does an RPA developer actually do day to day?

Builds bots that survive selector and layout changes, designs exception handling for unattended runs, and keeps credentials out of workflow steps entirely. Part of the job is deciding what should not be automated at all.

Do you hire for a specific RPA platform?

Matched to your actual platform. Resilience and exception-handling judgement transfers across UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism, then the evaluation confirms fluency with whichever you run.

Can we run our own interviews as well?

Yes, the published tasks are built to be reused directly. Several clients now run the exception-handling exercise themselves in later hiring rounds.

How fast can an RPA developer start?

A shortlist arrives within days from a bench evaluated continuously. Actual start speed after that depends on how quickly your side can grant platform and system access.

Who manages the engineer day to day?

Your process owners set automation priorities and review the bots built. We hold the employment side instead, covering payroll and arranging continuity if someone needs replacing.

What if the engineer is not the right fit?

A miss reported early costs you nothing beyond the delay of finding it. We fold the specific mismatch into the brief for whoever replaces the developer.

Do your RPA developers use AI tools?

Yes, to accelerate first-draft workflow steps and test scripts. The developer still owns every exception path, credential decision and selector choice that ships into production.

How does pricing work for a hired RPA developer?

Rate bands here are a starting point, not the final word; the shortlist pins the actual number for your engineer. Monthly billing, no placement fee, notice-period exit only.