For tenants where permissions have outgrown anyone's memory of them

Hire SharePoint Developers

A SharePoint environment rarely collapses at once; it drifts through years of small permission exceptions. A permission granted as a one-off, a migration that never validated its metadata, or a library that quietly crosses a performance threshold can each become the incident nobody saw coming. These developers are tested on catching exactly that kind of drift, then placed inside the tenant you already run.

  • Profiles typically within two business days
  • Replacement Assurance: If an engineer is not the right fit, a replacement from our own team starts within ten business days of your request, at no extra cost
  • You interview before placement if you want to
  • At least four hours a day inside your core working hours. Two hours plus a daily written handover for the US West Coast
  • 14-Day Risk-Free Trial: For your first engineer on a time-and-materials engagement. Up to 14 calendar days or 80 logged working hours, whichever comes first. End within the trial and pay nothing for trial hours. Continue beyond it and those hours are billed at the agreed rate. Unpaid trial work remains ours if you stop
Permissions that hold at scaleReplacement is our cost, not yoursAI augmented, human governedEvidence before estimatesYour IP from day oneOne accountable owner per engagementFounded in 2011. Part of the Vinove Group500+ full-time engineers, as of September 2026NASSCOM member
Watch · the 90-second brief

How we evaluate a SharePoint developer

The tasks, the signals and the onboarding, walked through by the people who run them.

90 secWatch without filling in a form.
Engineers reviewing SharePoint permission behaviour together.90 secSample frame · video pending

01Published, not promised

The assessment behind every SharePoint developer we send.

Five competencies sit behind this bar, each tied to a concrete task and the tell that ends a candidacy. Familiarity with the admin centre alone is not what is scored here. What is scored is whether a migration actually preserves what people depend on.

What we listen forWhether they design permission structure deliberately, not let it sprawl by exception.

The task we set

A site's permission structure has grown through years of one-off exceptions and nobody trusts who can see what. Propose an approach.

What strong sounds like
Proposes auditing and rebuilding around a small number of clear permission groups instead of patching more exceptions on top.
What gives us pause
Recommends adding another one-off exception to solve the immediate request without addressing the underlying sprawl.
Core

SharePoint Online · SPFx · PnP PowerShell

Automation

Power Automate · Power Apps · Nintex

Integration

Microsoft Graph API · REST API · Azure AD

Tooling

SharePoint Migration Tool · ShareGate · Visual Studio Code

02Who you actually meet

The bench, priced by seniority.

Three seniority tiers, priced honestly, and the engineers who fill each one today. Real names and photos take their place as soon as we can share them, and the standard stays exactly the same.

Engineer

Features scoped tightly enough to ship inside your review bar, every time.

The right first hire when your seniors already set the standard.

$1,900–2,500per month

Senior

The hard module nobody else wants to own, taken end to end.

Ownership of a surface, without adding a manager to your headcount.

$2,700–3,400per month

Lead

The workstream's decisions, made daily, so nothing waits on a meeting.

One accountable voice for a pod or initiative that can't afford to drift.

$3,700–4,700per month

  • SharePoint developer

    3 yrs · US East overlap

    Rebuilt a permission-inheritance structure that had quietly exposed a restricted document library

    • SPFx
    • Power Automate
    • Microsoft Graph
  • Senior SharePoint developer

    5 yrs · UK + EU hours

    Migrated a tenant's document libraries without breaking a single deep link in the process

    • Migration Tooling
    • Information Architecture
    • PnP PowerShell
  • Lead SharePoint architect

    8 yrs · EU + US split

    Owns the information-architecture standard across a multi-site enterprise intranet

    • Architecture
    • Governance
    • Large List Performance

Indicative ranges, representative profiles. Exact figures and named engineers arrive with your shortlist.

Weighing this against a freelancer, a direct hire or a marketplace? See the honest comparison

03From stated problem to first change

Four steps, each closing on evidence.

What this tests is real information-architecture judgement, not tool familiarity alone. Stepping away at any point carries no cost to you.

  1. Name the environment problem

    We map where your environment is under real strain, whether that's permission sprawl, a stalled migration or a library hitting its limits. The brief names that exact gap, not a list of SharePoint features.

    A brief your IT lead signs off on
  2. Match against your environment

    Candidates are screened against your actual tenant setup, your migration history and your governance model. Three developers who understand your environment beat thirty who simply list SharePoint as a skill.

    Three fits, not thirty resumes
  3. Assess on real environment tasks

    Your team can watch the permission-design and migration-planning exercises directly. What shows up is information-architecture judgement, not familiarity with a feature list.

    An evaluation you can watch
  4. Onboard into your tenant

    Tenant access, governance standards and a first scoped change inside a real site collection. Continuity cover keeps a departure from ever stalling a migration.

    A change into your tenant by week one

04Evidence and proof

Developers who kept a migration clean and permissions intact.

SharePoint proof is a migration that preserves what people actually depend on, not a feature-list recital. Every record here waits for written client approval before production.

Explore case studies
A SharePoint permission structure rebuilt ahead of a tenant migration.
Pillar Learning · EdTech platform, US

A permission structure rebuilt before a tenant migration, not during it.

Pillar Learning's site permissions had grown through years of one-off exceptions nobody could fully explain. An embedded SharePoint developer audited and rebuilt the structure around a small set of clear groups before the tenant migration began.

Permission exceptions removed
Over 60
Migration incidents
Zero
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of a CTO discussing a SharePoint migration.

Our tenant migration went through without a single permission issue, which has never happened before.

Daniel MercerCTO, Vela Ledger
Sample · pending client approval
Portrait of a product VP discussing a SharePoint permission rebuild.

She rebuilt a permission structure nobody on our team fully understood anymore, and documented every group.

Anika RaoVP Product, Koru Health
Sample · pending client approval

05Three shapes, one standard

Add a developer, a migration pod, or a practice.

Most teams start with one developer working inside an existing tenant. Some need a pod that owns a migration or platform rebuild end to end. Where the whole collaboration platform needs rethinking, we point you to enterprise platforms instead.

  • One named developer

    A single SharePoint specialist working inside your governance model and your review process. The lightest commitment, and where most engagements start.

    Team extension
  • A migration pod

    A pod with its own lead that owns a migration or platform rebuild end to end, from plan through cutover. You set priorities while the pod delivers.

    Delivery pods
  • The practice, not the person

    Where the collaboration platform itself needs rethinking rather than one role filled, our enterprise platforms practice takes that scope on instead.

    Enterprise Platforms

06Straight answers

Asked before a SharePoint hire is signed.

What does a SharePoint developer actually do day to day?

Designs permission structures that don't collapse as a site grows, chooses between SPFx and Power Automate for a given need, and keeps large libraries fast under real load. Most of the job is judgement no course covers.

Do you hire for SharePoint Online, on-premises, or both?

Matched to your environment, whether that's SharePoint Online, a hybrid setup or a legacy on-premises farm. The evaluation focuses on information-architecture judgement that holds across versions.

Can we run our own interviews as well?

Yes. Several clients have adopted the permission-inheritance exercise as a standard part of their own final-round interviews.

How fast can a SharePoint developer start?

Most clients see a shortlist within a week, sourced from a bench we keep evaluated continuously. From there, start date depends largely on how quickly tenant permissions are granted.

Who manages the engineer day to day?

Day-to-day direction and review stay with your IT or collaboration lead, exactly as they would for an in-house hire. Our part is the administrative layer behind that: payroll, continuity and replacement if needed.

What if the engineer is not the right fit?

If it isn't working early on, tell us and we replace the developer at our expense. We treat the reason for the mismatch as information for the next match, not just a formality.

Do your SharePoint developers use AI tools?

Yes, for scaffolding repetitive SPFx components and migration scripts. Permission design and information-architecture decisions stay with the developer, checked the same way any change would be.

How does pricing work for a hired SharePoint developer?

The rate band above is a starting reference; the number attached to your shortlist is the one that actually applies. Payment is monthly per developer, there's no finder's fee, and exit runs on notice.